The Weekend Essay: Rhodes may Fall – but many other mining villains remain unscathed

Published by MAC on 2020-06-26
Source: Nostromo Research, The Guardian (2020-06-25)

London Calling proposes a new representation of past and present

We are happy to present this argument that will hopefully resound among our readers – whether they be activists, academics, or simply adherents to the values the MAC website has sought to promote for the past twenty years.

Responses are welcome at: info@mines and

[London Calling is published by Nostromo Reseach, and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other person or body. Reproduction of this column is welcomed].

Going beyond BAME Lives Matter

Nostromo Research

26 June 2020
Cecil Rhodes attended Oxford’s Oriel College in the 1870s before locating to South Africa. He not only founded the world’s largest diamond mining company, De Beers, but also helped forge apartheid, based on racial separation and rampant labour exploitation of blacks. Through such machinations, he became the prime minister of Cape Colony in 1890 and one of the richest of men – ever.

Little wonder, then, that he’s now become targeted by the “BAME (“Black Asian, Minority Ethnic) Lives Matter movement which has swept through the USA, Britain, South Africa and elsewhere, triggered by the police murder of George Floyd in the USA. It’s highly likely that this particular Anglo-Saxon Uber-Imperialist will soon have the statue of him at Oriel College removed or “relocated” to another site (a museum perhaps).

That’s if his effigy doesn’t first get thrown into the river by protesters, as recently occurred with the Bristolian slave-trader, Edward Colston, though the eponymous Colston assembly hall was fortunately spared.

Doubtless, most people in Oxford, especially students and enlightened academics, will welcome the Rhodes de-motion open-armed. It will surely also prompt similar actions elsewhere, directed at those of his ilk.

However, let’s ask ourselves what the term “those of his kind” should really invoke?

Digging up the past, prefiguring the future

There were many denigrators and enslavers of Africans during the 19th and early twentieth century who still remain “memorialised” (or simply   ignored). Digging out and defacing their effigies is clearly a valid, potent, community activity, that cannot be denied.

But the important challenge for us all (however we choose to self-characterise) is to evolve a clearly-focussed “trope”, a paradigm, that narrows our focus, while simultaneously broadening its educative and demonstrative appeal.

This can be done by going beyond the allegorical down-fall of of just one man, such as Rhodes, who died well outside our living memory.

Nor are many other such men actually dead or plain White.

Remember Robert Mugabe or Joseph Kabila of DR Congo, Paul Kigame of Rwanda and the country’s military commander Emmanuel Karenzi Karake – just a few of those who committed atrocities, arguably even genocides? There are those associated with colonial-era mining companies which they’ve re-adopted and supported – not just Anglo-De Beers, but Union Miniere from the former Belgian Congo – in modern ways distinctly reminiscent of the past.

As our website has painstakingly shown for the past two decades, we cannot and must not, let such perpetrators of human rights abuse, terrestrial invasions, appalling atrocity and dehumanisation, rest in peace. Nor should their current portrayals remain undisturbed, above all in order that future   generations will better learn their true history.

A monumental moment

Indeed, black lives do matter.

So do those of million of Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples across numerous jurisdictions.

There’s no better or more graphic means of conveying that message than dramatising what extractive industry has done – and continues doing – to millions of people, in pursuit of that sector’s own iniquitous attempts to “save the world”, as we have been sold this truly heart-rending myth for far too long.


Oxford college backs removal of Cecil Rhodes statue

Oriel College launches independent commission to examine key issues around imperialist’s statue

Aamna Mohdin , Richard Adams, and Ben Quinn

The Guardian

18 June 2020

Oxford University’s Oriel College has voted in favour of removing its statue of the Victorian imperialist Cecil Rhodes and will set up an independent inquiry into the key issues around it following a student-led campaign that began four years ago.

The governing body of Oriel College meeting follows protests by the Rhodes Must Fall campaign outside the college over the past two weeks. The campaign, which started in 2015 but dwindled after students graduated, was reignited by the recent Black Lives Matter demonstrations across the UK, which included the dramatic toppling of a statue of the slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol.

Oriel College voted on Wednesday to launch an independent commission of inquiry into the key issues surrounding the Rhodes statue. A spokesperson said in a statement that they had “expressed their wish to remove the statue of Cecil Rhodes … This is what they intend to convey to the independent commission.”

The statement continued: “Both of these decisions were reached after a thoughtful period of debate and reflection and with the full awareness of the impact these decisions are likely to have in Britain and around the world.

“The commission will deal with the issue of the Rhodes legacy and how to improve access and attendance of BAME [black, Asian and minority ethnic] undergraduate, graduate students and faculty, together with a review of how the college’s 21st century commitment to diversity can sit more easily with its past.”

The governing body appointed Carole Souter CBE, the current master of St Cross College and former chief executive of the National Lottery Heritage Fund, to be the chair of the commission.

Inspired by student activism in South Africa, hundreds of Oxford students campaigned for the removal of the likeness of Rhodes, who supported apartheid-style measures in southern Africa, from the facade of the college in 2016. The campaign also called for the university curriculum to be changed to reflect diversity of thought beyond the western canon and for better support for BAME student and staff.

A spokesperson for the campaign said they were cautiously optimistic after the announcement. “We have been down this route before, where Oriel College has committed to taking a certain action, but has not followed through: notably, in 2015, when the college committed to engaging in a six-month-long democratic listening exercise. Therefore, while we remain hopeful, our optimism is cautious. While the governing body of Oriel College have ‘expressed their wish’ to take down the statue, we continue to demand their commitment.”

Simukai Chigudu, an associate professor of African politics at the University of Oxford and founding member of the Rhodes Must Fall campaign, said: “This statement bears some resemblance to the first statement they issued in 2016, but it includes the crucial, additional detail that the governing body itself has voted for the statue to be removed. I think that’s a substantial shift in their position.”

He added: “But it does leave room for ambiguity. This is not a definitive victory, it’s a sign of progress in the right direction. I think this is a paradigm shift, I think that the amount of pressure on Oriel College from different constituency has been a lot greater this time. I think there’s been more time to marinate in the wider anti-racist, anti-colonial arguments that underpin Rhodes Must Fall thinking. I think all of those things have fed into the discussion that has taken place.”

Layla Moran, Liberal Democrat leadership candidate and Oxford West MP, said it was “the right decision” and called for the statue to be put in a museum where it can help inform people about Britain’s past. She added: “I hope this represents a true turning point and that other institutions will follow Oriel’s lead and take down statues of slave traders and white supremacists.”

Robert Gildea, a professor of Modern History at the University of Oxford, had announced earlier that Worcester College governing body voted for the statue to be taken down and put in a museum. The Guardian understands a further college also voted for the statue to be taken down.

Gildea said: “Oriel is to be congratulated on making this first decision to take down this statue, so that we no longer have to pay homage to a century-old symbol of colonialism and white supremacy … This is a historic moment to be savoured.”

Three Oxford college heads, Valerie Amos, the incoming master of University College, Roger Goodman, warden of St Antony’s College, and Kate Tunstall, provost of Worcester College, had all come out in support of the campaign in the past week. The graduate student body of Oriel College also voted this week in favour of removing the statue.

Michelle Donelan, the universities minister, described the campaign to remove the controversial statue of Cecil Rhodes from an Oxford college as “short-sighted”. She said we should “remember and learn” from history rather than “edit” the past.

In 2016, Oriel said the statue would stay, with modifications that “draw attention to this history [and] do justice to the complexity of the debate”. It had been warned that it could lose about £100m in gifts should the statue be taken down, but it insisted financial implications were not the primary motive behind its decision.

The announcement came after another day of mounting pressure on the university authorities. Earlier, black and minority ethnic staff voiced their support for both the Rhodes Must Fall and Black Lives Matter campaigns, telling the vice-chancellor, Louise Richardson, of their concern about “inadequate messages about countering institutional racism” from the university.

A letter from the BME staff network said it “stands in solidarity with the global Black Lives Matter protests, as well as with the Rhodes Must Fall Movement at the University of Oxford … As these movements have shown, [BAME] staff and students are heavily underrepresented in UK higher education and face institutional racism in many forms.”

The group said it wanted the university to acknowledge and support its BAME staff after the trauma and protests that have followed the killing of George Floyd. “This would entail recognition that the university is also complicit in racism, and indeed that while our work as [BAME] staff is foregrounded as proof of diversity, there are few mechanisms of support provided within the institution in solidarity against racism,” the letter states.
The letter was published a week after members of the university’s African and Caribbean society said they were so disillusioned by Oxford’s failure to tackle racism that they no longer work on its outreach programmes to attract other black students.

A spokesperson for Oxford said the university had received the letter and would be giving a full reply. “The university has acknowledged that it has, as Britain does, a history that is marked by colonialism and imperialism. Although we cannot change this fact, we must continue to create a genuinely diverse and inclusive academic community in which students and staff feel respected and secure.

“We are committed to addressing systemic racism wherever it may be found, including within our own community,” the spokesperson said.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s