Liberia: Mittal Steel ‘Hooked’ Again

Last updated Dec 8, 2021

By Mark N. Mengonfia – mmenginfia@gmail.com

MONROVIA – It appears like the current  Mineral Development Agreement(MDA)  between  the Liberian government and Arcelor Mittal has  come under  intense criticism. This time, from a senator of Montserrado County who thinks that  the deal should not be ratified until specific things  which, AML previously committed itself to are done.

For instance, in the  previous agreement,  AML should have built a beneficiation   plant, but failed to do so.  Again, it  failed to build  the  hospital; failed to live up to the number of employees-three thousand. Rather, it only employed 2,000 Liberians.

With this and others, Senator Darous Dilion from the opposition Liberty Party  has rejected its ratification in its current  state. That it should be ratified if AML shows a  its previous work plan which  indicated that it lived up to the previous agreement.

The agreement unlike previous one, is facing series of objections.  Dilion’s  criticism comes in less than a week after a group of people from  Bong, Grand  Bassa and Nimba counties petitioned their lawmakers last week not to ratify the agreement until  AML provides its previous work plan  and lived up to its commitment.

Appearing on a local radio station Talk show, OK FM, Senator  Dilion said  what is before them should not be ratified in its current state or form.

He furthered that there is no need for rush now and that they are going to take their time for the right agreement to be reached that will benefit both the concessioner, the government and ordinary Liberians as well.

According to him, the AML deal should not be ratified in its current form, but all the concerns should be noted before reaching the point of approval by them, the Liberian Legislature.

The Montserrado County lawmaker said  the current state of the agreement will not benefit the government and its people and as such, there is a likelihood for it to be equated to  the pervious one which did not satisfy many of the lines that were agreed upon many years back.

Referencing the agreement, he said since Liberians never had the skills back then, it was agreed that the expatriates be brought in country to perform some of those roles, but should later be replaced once Liberians get the skills.

He indicated that the refusal by the company to not build the plant is somehow depraving the country of needed revenue generation.

According to him, when  AML was asked why they have not been able to live up to  the agreements,   they informed them of the Ebola crisis.

“There was Ebola but yet they were shipping ore,” he said.

He  said if the ores are processed in Liberia, it will be known that Liberia will benefit from other mineral resources separate from the ore. That, he said, AML is benefiting from other mineral resources.

The Liberian Senator indicated that the Liberian government is seeking for the ratification of the recent agreement but was quick to say AML has not  achieved their benchmark when it comes to  the agreement they reached with the government of Liberia.

Senator Dillon said there is no guarantee that the company will live  up  to this other agreement.

He said any investment that comes to Liberia that seeks to employ Liberians, he, as a Liberian welcomes it and so he welcomes the AML, but added that the company and the government have their role to play in ensuring that the agreement is a win, win one; meaning all parties should benefit and live by what was agreed upon.

Senator Dillon said while AML is making her profit, the country and its people should benefit as well.

“It is not only the royalty in taxes we want, we want to ensure that they do the right things” the Liberian senator added.

“If you have not built the plant because of Ebola, what will make me think that you will not put it on Corona Virus?” he inquired.

“Housing, media, educational facilities, but they have not achieved again on those  grounds that the drop in the price of iron ore on the world market,” he said.

He said at this point, what should be put before AML is to ensure that they comply with the terms and conditions laid down in the agreement.

SOURCE:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s